![]() We work closely with global device makers when it comes to testing and benchmarking devices powered by our chipsets, but ultimately brands have the flexibility to configure their own devices as they see fit. MediaTek follows accepted industry standards and is confident that benchmarking tests accurately represent the capabilities of our chipsets. MediaTek today responded to the allegations. ![]() This means that the SoC is being allowed to more quickly ramp up to higher frequencies long enough to maintain a high benchmark score, without caring about thermals and overheating.Īccording to the article, popular benchmarks being detected include PCMark, AnTuTu, and GeekBench, in addition to an array of AI-centric tests and other tools. Sports Mode appears to alter the dynamic voltage and frequency scaling of the SoC, memory controller frequency, and thermal and scheduler settings, when these whitelisted benchmarks are being run. It says that MediaTek has incorporated a simple whitelist in their firmware files that detects certain benchmarks, and enables what it calls “Sports Mode,” allegedly to artificially inflate benchmark scores. The article also claims that MediaTek appears have targeted specific many popular benchmarks. The reviewer claims that in systems benchmarks such as PCMark, the Mediatek's Cortex-A75 class SoC (Helio P95) performed much better than a MediaTek Dimensity 1000L SoC found in a Chinese version of the Reno3 smartphone. Specifically, they tested Oppo’s new Reno3 Pro device, which uses the European version with MediaTek’s Helio P95 chipset. This time, an AnandTech article about an Oppo smartphone powered by a Mediatek SoC alleges that the chip gave an unexpectedly high performance during benchmarking. Since benchmark scores and figures are considered by most users as a good way to compare the performance of devices, companies have responded by making some unfair tricks as they seek to gain a competitive edge. In the past, many benchmark cheats have been exposed in virtually every market, from high-performance GPUs to low-power, mainstream mobile devices. ![]() For more information, you can compare your results online.Taiwanese SoC vendor MediaTek is allegedly cheating when its chips are detecting benchmarking applications in order to inflate the performance scores. It presents an overall score, a graphics score, and a CPU score, allowing you to identify if either your CPU or GPU might be holding you back in terms of 3D rendering. When it's done running the benchmark, 3DMark will present you with an in-depth results screen. If your computer is capable of running it, 3DMark will automatically put it front and center, allowing you to simply click RUN to get the ball rolling. ![]() Since we're interested in 3D performance, the free Time Spy benchmark is perfect. If you want to see if your hardware is up to the task of running resource-intensive modern games, this benchmark is what you're looking for.ģDMark comes with a lot of benchmarks, many of which are only available if you pay for the premium version. This benchmark is primarily aimed at gamers, and its individual benchmarks are each designed to simulate games with 3D rendered graphics. A lot of the benchmarks are locked behind a paywall.Ī lot of our favorite benchmarks include 3D elements, but 3DMark is specifically focused on that task and an easy pick for the best 3D benchmark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |